Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 11:29:22 +0100 (CET) From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Linux/m68k Subject: L68K: Patch for 2.1.85 Sender: owner-linux-m68k@phil.uni-sb.de I didn't say that a 68040 always has a FPU, but that the _values_ of the CPU_68040, FPU_68040 and MMU_68040 symbols are equal and that we may rely on that. I enlarged the diff context to make this more clear. --- linux-2.1.85/include/asm-m68k/setup.h.orig Sun Feb 8 12:00:31 1998 +++ linux-2.1.85/include/asm-m68k/setup.h Sun Feb 8 16:37:12 1998 @@ -128,13 +128,13 @@ * CPU, FPU and MMU types * * Note: we may rely on the following equalities: * * CPU_68020 == MMU_68851 * CPU_68030 == MMU_68030 - * CPU_68040 == FPU_68040 == MMU_68040 (not strictly, think of 68LC040!) + * CPU_68040 == FPU_68040 == MMU_68040 * CPU_68060 == FPU_68060 == MMU_68060 */ #define CPUB_68020 0 #define CPUB_68030 1 #define CPUB_68040 2 Sorry, no more diffs yet. Last week I've been to busy with configuring an i486SX box as a router for our student network. It runs DNS, WINS (yeikes) via Samba... Smbclient is fun, especially in combination with procmail: now Win95 users get a WinPopup message if they have new mail. Greetings, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/ Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium