
//=============================================================================
/**
 *  @file    including.idl
 *
 *  $Id: including.idl 96121 2012-08-30 19:28:49Z parsons $
 *
 *  This file contains examples of IDL code that has
 *  caused problems in the past for the TAO IDL
 *  compiler. This test is to make sure the problems
 *  stay fixed.
 *
 *
 *  @author Jeff Parsons <parsons@cs.wustl.edu> and TAO users.
 */
//=============================================================================

#ifndef IDL_TEST_INCLUDING_IDL
#define IDL_TEST_INCLUDING_IDL

#include "included.idl"

enum choice
{
  dog
};

union myUnion switch (choice)
{
  // Typedef is in included file
  case dog: Aok::Seq1Type cat;
};

// Enum discriminator is in included file
union Bog switch (Agog)
{
  case Agog1: long bog1;
  case Agog2: long bog2;
  case Agog3: long bog3;
};

// We had a name clash with Me and ME, but the
// rule that requires type defined in a scope
// which is defined in an interface to be
// added to the referenced types in the interface's
// scope doesn't apply here, because Me is not
// defined in the struct, only referenced.
interface iface
{
  enum postal
  {
    ME,
    TAO_FE  // FE is #defined on HP-UX 10.20, so I prefix it with TAO
  };

  struct using_incl
  {
    Aok::Me field1;
  };
};

module VT_Test
{
  typedef sequence<VT_Def::VT> VTSeq;
};

// References to A::MyStructA from included.idl get the
// forward declaration from lookup, and we were
// getting empty typename generation in various places,
// before overriding the visit methods for forward
// declared structs and unions in the relevant visitors.
module A
{
  const long smth = 6;
};

exception MyException
{
  A::MyStructA exField;
};

struct TestStr
{
  A::MyStructA field;
};

union TestUn switch (long)
{
  case 0: A::MyStructA  value1;
  case 1: string value2;
};

interface MyInt
{
  A::MyStructA op (in A::MyStructA ab);
};

// A different enum with the same enum values is
// defined in the base interface in the same scope
// in another IDL file included by this one. The
// construction is legal and should be accepted.
module RootModule
{
  module SUBMODULE1
  {
    interface ChildIF : ParentIF
    {
      enum DifferentMode
      {
        NORMAL,
        FAULTY,
        UNKNOWN
      };
    };
  };
};

interface AAA;

interface B
{
  typedef AAA::my_long_type my_b_long;
};

#endif /* IDL_TEST_INCLUDING_IDL */

